Legal Opinion
Prichard v. McCranie
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 1, 1926No. 25783PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
This is a suit to partition in kind a certain lot or parcel of ground in square 6 of Hart’s addition to the city of Monroe, La.
The plaintiffs in the action are J. Drew Prichard, Mrs. Ruth Prichard, -wife of Norton Myatt, and Mrs. Charlotte Prichard Breard, wife of John M. Breard, Jr.
The defendants are George W. MeCranie, Jr., and Don M. MeCranie.
The judgment of the court below recognized plaintiffs as owners in indivisión, each of an undivided 169/1728 interest, and defendants as owners in indivisión, each of an undivided 169/576 interest, in the property sought to be partitioned, and ordered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gilmer v. O'NealSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Folger v. PalmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Duffourc v. DuffourcSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Medicis v. MedicisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- City of Baltimore v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Doll v. DollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Mitcham v. MitchamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Successions of ScardinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Fabacher v. FabacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Succession of McGearySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.