Legal Opinion
Martin v. Rison
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 26, 1990No. C-88-2570-CALPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEGGE, District Judge.
This action was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, and was briefed, argued and submitted for decision. The court has heard and reviewed the testimony of the witnesses, and has reviewed the record, the exhibits admitted into evidence, the deposition transcripts admitted into evidence, the answers to interrogatories, the applicable authorities, and the arguments of counsel. This opinion constitutes the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, as provided in Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The facts stated below are found to be…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jordan v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Lomax v. FiedlerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. RisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- The Chronicle Publishing Co. v. R.H. Rison, Etc., Dannie Martin v. R.H. Rison, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992