Legal Opinion

Williams v. Cimarron Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1966No. A-11406PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an action to recover medical, hospital and funeral expenses under the medical payments provision of an automobile insurance policy issued by Cimarron Insurance Co., Inc. The facts are stipulated and the controlling question is whether the stock car racer here involved is comprehended by the definition of “automobile” contained in coverage C of the policy. The trial court held that it was not and rendered judgment that plaintiff, Jimmy Ray Williams, take nothing against the insurance company. The Court of Civil Appeals at Amarillo affirmed. 400 S.W.2d 805. In our…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennell v. United InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. HudmanTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Davis v. National Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lang v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass'n v. HudmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kansas Farm Bureau Insurance v. CoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Spawglass Construction Corp. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Thompson v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Stallcup v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  5. Wilno v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API