Legal Opinion

John Doe v. State of Idaho

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 2012No. 38672, 38784PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

John Doe appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to seal the criminal case file from his 1990 felony conviction for battery with the intent to commit rape. Because we conclude that the district court did not correctly interpret the law governing Doe’s request, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.

I

BACKGROUND

In 1990, Doe was charged with battery with the intent to commit rape, Idaho Code § 18-911, and forcible sexual penetration with a foreign object, I.C. § 18-6608. Pursuant to a plea agreement, he pleaded guilty to the battery charge and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. CaudillIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Miller v. HallerIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. GittinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. AllenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Miguel C. Joyner v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. ClappIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. Daniel MontgomeryIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API