Legal Opinion
Jackson v. A.M.F. Bowling Centers, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 23, 2001No. Civ.A. DKC99-2704PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Pending before the court and ready for resolution in this negligence action is the motion for summary judgment of Defendant, A.M.F. Bowling Centers, Inc. (“A.M.F.”). No hearing is deemed necessary, and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, the court shall grant the motion.
1. Background
The following facts are undisputed or presented in the light most favorable to Plaintiff. Defendant entered into an oral agreement with Mr. Chauncy Maddox and Icy Ice Productions (“Icy Ice”) to rent the A.M.F. bowling alley, in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Stevens v. Howard D. Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCullough v. Liberty Heights Health & Rehabilitation CenterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Dinardo v. It's My Amphitheater, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Dinardo v. It's My Amphitheater, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Shakeri v. MGM National Harbor, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Tolbert-Boyd v. MGM National Harbor, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.