McNeil Construction Co. v. Livingston State Bank
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Chief Judge.
In a former decision in this case on December 4, 1957, this Court held that McNeil Construction Company was not the proper party plaintiff and could not maintain the action in its own behalf, but because it had been suggested in briefs that McNeil should be permitted to maintain the action on behalf of Seaboard Surety Company as a trustee of an express trust, leave was granted McNeil to file an amended complaint to attempt to state a claim as trustee of an express trust. McNeil Construction Co. v. Livingston State Bank, D.C., 160 F.Supp. 809. Pursuant to this leave,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co., Inc. v. All American Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Rae v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Dredging Co. v. Federal Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. Fargo National BankDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1967
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Thunderbird BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975