Legal Opinion

American Rivers v. National Marine Fisheries Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1997No. 95-35462PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

Environmental and commercial fishing organizations 1 (collectively “American Rivers”), appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment and its grant of defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment. The defendants are the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) and the federal agencies2 that operate the Federal Columbia River Power System (“River Power System”). American Rivers contends that the federal agencies violated § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2), because the operation of the River Power System…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Save the Yaak Committee, Donn Vance v. J.R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture R. Max Peterson, Chief, Forest Service Thomas Costin, Region I ForesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grand Canyon Trust v. United States Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  3. Sutcliffe v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  5. Santillan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API