Legal Opinion

Payne Shoe Co. v. Dawson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1915No. 19,769PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Per curiam

This action was commenced in the district court of Shawnee county, Kansas, April 1, 1918, to enjoin the attorney-general and the one hundred five county attorneys of the state of Kansas from enforcing the provisions of chapter 180 of the Laws of 1913, commonly called the “Pure Shoe Law.” A temporary injunction against all the defendants was issued. The defendants filed a demurrer to the petition. This demurrer was sustained. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, but the temporary injunction was continued in force until the appeal should be heard in this court. The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Duggan v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Tootle v. BerkleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Waters v. GarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Anderson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Knight v. HirbourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ash v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Andeel v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Moses v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Bryson v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. True v. McCoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API