Legal Opinion

Tootle v. Berkley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1899No. 11167PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error from Decatur district court; A. C. T. Geiger, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J. :

This proceeding involves the validity of an order of revivor, and the subsequent action of the district court in refusing to set aside the order of revivor because the judge who made the order was disqualified to act in the case.

It appears that on March 8, 1892, R. J. Berkley recovered a judgment against Tootle, Hosea & Co. and other defendants for the sum of $2000, together with interest that had accrued for a period of about five years. In October, 1897, a motion was made to revive this judgment, it being alleged that it was wholly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Pearce v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  3. Washington Insurance v. PriceNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
  4. John F. Limerick & Co. v. MurlattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Metsker v. WhitsellIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. PruettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. State v. RoatSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Sage Stores Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API