Legal Opinion

Knight v. Hirbour

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1902No. 12,087PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an injunction suit involving the possessory right to a corpse. The plaintiff in error is an undertaker. In January, 1900, a man was killed by the cars in the city of Topeka. Plaintiff in error took possession of the body without authority of any of the friends or kin of the deceased. Upon learning that the dead man had relatives in Ohio, and that it would be necessary to send the body there for burial, the plaintiff in error, under the claim that in such cases the rules of the board of health required the remains to be encased in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tootle v. BerkleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Begeman v. NaptonMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Romain v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  4. Bardsley v. SternbergWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Ellis v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Duggan v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Anderson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Andeel v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. McAlister v. State Ex Rel. ShortSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Seaverns v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API