Legal Opinion

ANAYA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1973No. 2243PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2243 MATTER OF ANAYA In Deportation Proceedings A-20505711 A-20507231 Decided by Board November 23, 1973 (1) An alien has no "right" to remain indefinitely in the United States in violation of the immigration laws merely because of the existence of citizen children. (2) The granting of the indefinite voluntary departure privilege to natives of the Western Hemisphere with citizen ties in the United States is a matter within the sole discretion of the district director and is not reviewable by the Board of Immigration Appeals. CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a)(2) [8…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hintopoulos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Manuel Mendez and Teresa Lastra De Mendez v. H. I. Major, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. Dominador S. Perdido and Melva Pating Liguigan Perdido v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Susan M. Faustino, an Infant Under the Age of 14 Years, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Albano Vieira v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. GERONIMOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SHAARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  2. MEDINABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  3. QUINTEROBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
  4. LENNONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  5. MORALESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API