Legal Opinion
MDS Associates, Limited Partnership v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 11, 1997No. 93-429CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court after trial. MDS Associates, Limited Partnership, and F. Gregg Bemis, Jr. (“plaintiffs”), brought *613suit against the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1994), for reasonable and entire compensation for the unauthorized use and manufacture of the invention described in United States Patent No. 3,737,902 (the “ ’902 patent”). By agreement of the parties, only the liability portion of the case was tried, with damages to be determined at a later date if the court found defendant liable for infringement of the ’902 patent. The scope of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Micrel, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. v. Station Casinos, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2024