Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 5, 2024No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR vs. SANCTIONS OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., Defendant. BACKGROUND Relevant here, defendant, Omega, served plaintiff, Buergofol, with requests for discovery regarding prior art. See Docket 164 at 1 (stating the interrogatory asked Buergofol to identify every item of prior art to each patent in suit known to Buergofol and the request for production asked Buergofol for all documents and things in its possession, custody, or control that would qualify as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.