Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Social Services Ex Rel. A.D.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] D.Y. (father) appeals the termination of his parental rights over his ten-year-old daughter. The only question of merit in this appeal is whether the filing of a Korth brief is appropriate in an abuse and neglect appeal. We conclude that it is and affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Father is thirty-eight years of age and currently resides in Sioux Falls. He was never married to child’s mother although they did live together for a time and had a volatile relationship. Child was born in 1993 and lived with mother and two older step-siblings in Flandreau. Mother was a chronic alcoholic unable to maintain…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In re D.A.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- People Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- A.C. v. Cabinet for Health & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
- In re N.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to: NRL, EL and EYL, Minor Children, ELWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.