Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fernandes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 4, 2019No. SJC-12429PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudd, J.

**2*700Until recently, we provided only limited guidance regarding legal instructions furnished to grand juries. We had held, for example, that "it is the duty of the district attorney in appropriate instances to advise [the grand jury] concerning the law," Attorney Gen. v. Pelletier, 240 Mass. 264, 307, 134 N.E. 407 (1922), and that an appropriate instance for such instructions is when the grand jury request them, Commonwealth v. Noble, 429 Mass. 44, 48, 707 N.E.2d 819 (1999). Then, in Commonwealth v. Walczak, 463 Mass. 808, 979 N.E.2d 732 (2012), we held that where the Commonwealth seeks to…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FernandesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  2. Commonwealth v. Barlow-Tucker Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024
  3. Commonwealth v. Nicholas AkerbergMassachusetts Superior Court · 2026
  4. Commonwealth v. Robert KawadaMassachusetts Superior Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API