Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Fernandes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 4, 2019No. SJC-12429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurrence

LOWY, J. (concurring).

**17Although I join Justice Cypher's concurrence, I write separately for three reasons. First, in my view prosecutors should instruct a grand jury on affirmative defenses and on mitigation whenever the evidence supports such instructions. It is good practice to do so, and a number of district attorneys' offices follow this approach. I would not require such instructions, however, for the compelling reasons outlined in Justice Cypher's opinion.

Second, I believe that Justice Budd's conclusion is unwieldy at best, and perhaps even unworkable. I agree with the dissent that…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. FernandesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API