Commonwealth v. Fernandes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Concurrence
LOWY, J. (concurring).
**17Although I join Justice Cypher's concurrence, I write separately for three reasons. First, in my view prosecutors should instruct a grand jury on affirmative defenses and on mitigation whenever the evidence supports such instructions. It is good practice to do so, and a number of district attorneys' offices follow this approach. I would not require such instructions, however, for the compelling reasons outlined in Justice Cypher's opinion.
Second, I believe that Justice Budd's conclusion is unwieldy at best, and perhaps even unworkable. I agree with the dissent that…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. FernandesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019