Legal Opinion

Adams v. Agrawal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court (Keniry, J.), entered October 24, 1991 in Rensselaer County, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint for failure to timely serve the complaint and for lack of jurisdiction.

Plaintiffs concede that defendant Ram Agrawal was not served with a summons and that the action against him should therefore be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. As to the remaining four defendants (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants), the record indicates that after being served with the summons, each promptly served a notice of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Fiore v. GalangNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Siegel v. WankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Nepomniaschi v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Iannielli v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Truppi v. BusciglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Kordasiewicz v. BCC Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Gibson v. Victory Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Young v. Mary Imogene Bassett HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Ault v. RichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API