Legal Opinion

Fiore v. Galang

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1985PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree that absent a sufficient affidavit of merits it was error, as a matter of law, not to grant defendant Hospital’s motion for summary judgment (Kel Mgt. Corp. v Rogers & Wells, 64 NY2d 904; Canter v Mulnick, 60 NY2d 689; Stolowitz v Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 NY2d 685). Moreover, in light of plaintiffs’ argument that the verified complaint should be accepted as an *1001affidavit of merits (CPLR 105 [t]), we note that, except as to matters within the ordinary experience and knowledge of laymen, in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Kel Management Corp. v. Rogers & WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Canter v. MulnickNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Stukas v. StreiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Gibbs v. St. Barnabas HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Mosberg v. ElahiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Lyons v. McCauleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Amsler v. VerrilliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API