Legal Opinion

Arthur & Shirley Pollack v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1987No. 86-1540PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-appellants, Arthur and Shirley Pollack (“the taxpayers”), appeal from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on June 10, 1986, granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the taxpayers’ complaint with prejudice. We find that, although the taxpayers styled their complaint as a suit to quiet title to real property under 28 U.S.C. § 2410, they were actually seeking to establish the amount of interest owed them on an overpayment. Since a suit to quiet title is not the proper means for obtaining such relief,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aqua Bar & Lounge, Inc. v. United States of America Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service and Joseph B. SaltzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Rena Falik v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. Laino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Broadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Michael J. Geiselman v. United States of America, Michael J. Geiselman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. James W. McCarty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Raymond E. McMillen Jr. And Laura McMillen v. United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. John J. Kulawy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API