Legal Opinion

Michael J. Geiselman v. United States of America, Michael J. Geiselman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 31, 1992No. 91-1501, 91-1738PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants in these consolidated appeals, Valerie Washburn Geiselman (appellant in No. 91-1501) and Michael Geiselman (appellant in both No. 91-1501 and No. 91-1738), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the United States of America and to Gerard Esposito, the District Director of the Internal Revenue Service (collectively, the “federal defendants”). Although the paths of these appeals wind through a procedural thicket and a small but dense forest of papers, they lead eventually to a clear patch of substantive legal ground. For the reasons stated below, we dismiss…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Laing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Bernstein v. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Davis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  4. Lunsford v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  5. Guthrie v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API