Legal Opinion

Kozuhowski Reuss v. Snigel Snigel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1926No. Appeal 85PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keeler, J.,

Plaintiffs brought this action of assumpsit to recover commissions alleged to be due them under a written contract constituting them defendants’ exclusive agents for the sale of certain real estate owned by the latter. Judgment was taken on September 11, 1925 for want of an affidavit of defense.

On September 21, 1925, defendants filed a petition praying for the opening of said judgment, alleging that the affidavit of defense had actually been filed in the prothonotary’s office on the morning of September 11th and before any judgment had been entered in the action. A rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Cinnaminson Park Co. v. LawsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Public Ledger Co. v. KleinmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Markell v. Lang Machine Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1972
  3. Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API