Cinnaminson Park Co. v. Laws
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 320, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from order of Municipal Court, Philadelphia Co., Feb. T., 1915, No. 228, making absolute rule to open judgment in case of Cinnaminson Park Company v. John Laws. Rule to open judgment. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was order making absolute rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kephart, J.,
The plaintiff brought suit to recover an amount due on a stock subscription. Judgment was entered for failure to file an answer. An attachment was issued directed to the Western Saving Fund Society, where the defendant had moneys on deposit. A petition was then presented asking that the judgment be opened and the defendant be permitted to make a defense. The court made an order directing the judgment to be opened and upon terms that three hundred dollars be impounded to satisfy any judgment that might be recovéred against the defendant.
It has been repeatedly held that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Colquhoun v. General Flooring & Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Italian Co-operative Banking Ass'n v. La SpadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Scott v. McEwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Dupree v. LEE, MDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Richards v. SwiftSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Kozuhowski Reuss v. Snigel SnigelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.