Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceSpaeth, Judge
Under the majority’s reasoning, the following might occur: (1) A party waits 40 days, without appealing; the party may ask the lower court to reconsider its decision, and the court may do so, change its mind, and decide in the party’s favor. (2) A party waits 40 days, does appeal, and the appeal is quashed as untimely; now, according to the majority, the party may not ask the lower court to reconsider its decision. I cannot join this reasoning; it depends upon giving legal effect to an action — the untimely appeal — that was a nullity. Nevertheless, I agree with the majority’s result, which I…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Breden v. GillilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Markofski v. YanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Strickler v. United Elevator Co. (Inc.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.