Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 2329Published

1ConcurrenceSpaeth, Judge

Under the majority’s reasoning, the following might occur: (1) A party waits 40 days, without appealing; the party may ask the lower court to reconsider its decision, and the court may do so, change its mind, and decide in the party’s favor. (2) A party waits 40 days, does appeal, and the appeal is quashed as untimely; now, according to the majority, the party may not ask the lower court to reconsider its decision. I cannot join this reasoning; it depends upon giving legal effect to an action — the untimely appeal — that was a nullity. Nevertheless, I agree with the majority’s result, which I…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Breden v. GillilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Markofski v. YanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Strickler v. United Elevator Co. (Inc.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API