Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Huenerbein

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1877PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county.

1Opinion of the Court

Hr. Justice Walkeb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of case, against the city of Chicago, to recover damages produced by throwing stone, earth, etc., into the mouth of a small stream that usually discharged into the canal, whereby water was dammed and flowed back on the land, and six or seven acres could not be planted or cultivated during the years 1871, 1872 and 1873. The court below permitted appellee to prove that if the land had been planted with potatoes, the ground would have yielded two hundred bushels to the acre, and that they would have sold at about an average…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Green v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Chicago & Rock Island Rail Road v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Cilley v. HawkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Olmstead v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Burruss v. HinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. Swift v. BroylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  4. Jones v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hichhorn, Mack & Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API