Legal Opinion
Honeycutt v. Kendall
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 22, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-75PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
This action arises as an outgrowth of a transaction between an insurance broker and an insured. Plaintiff Cecil Honeycutt, a Pennsylvania resident, requested defendant John Kendall, an insurance broker, to procure an automobile insurance policy for his benefit. Due to non-payment of premium, the insurance company, United States Fire and Guaranty (“USF & G”), cancelled the insurance policy. Subsequent to cancellation, plaintiff was involved in a one-car accident resulting in significant property damage and personal injury. Plaintiff seeks recovery…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Mitton v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co. Granite State Fire Ins. Co. v. MittonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Foster v. Nunmaker Discount CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MundorfSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Quintana v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
- Isaacson v. DeMartin Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Gist v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1986
- Anderson v. Beneficial Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988