Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Farmers Insurance Group

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 25, 2009No. 2008AP1605PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, P.J.

¶ 1. Edley H. and Lurline E. Stewart (collectively referred to as the Stewarts) appeal from a judgment and an amended order for judgment issued after the trial court refused to award them actual attorney fees and other expenses following their acceptance of Farmers Insurance Group's, d/b/a Fire Insurance Exchange, d/b/a Farmers Insurance Exchange (collectively referred to as Farmers), offer of judgment. On appeal, in addition to seeking actual attorney fees and other expenses, the Stewarts assert that they are entitled to interest on the amounts awarded to them at arbitration pursuant to Wis.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. DeChant v. Monarch Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Danner v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Jones v. Secura InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. ROEHL TRANSPORT v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Karen Elizabeth Morway v. David Seth MorwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API