McDanield v. Hemker
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10) in this action that arose when plaintiff Mable Lorraine McDanield (hereinafter McDanield) was injured in a motor vehicle accident, and in which action we are again called upon to discern the language of Kreiner v Fischer, 471 Mich 109; 683 NW2d 611 (2004), in determining whether McDanield suffered the necessary threshold injury constituting a serious impairment of body function pursuant to MCL 500.3135. We hold that, under the totality of the circumstances, McDanield…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fisher v. BlankenshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Netter v. BowmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Minter v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Caiger v. OakleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- McMullen v. DuddlesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.