Legal Opinion
Caiger v. Oakley
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2009No. Docket 285549PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for defendants Jason Oakley and Port Huron Auto Glass in this automobile negligence claim. We reverse and remand. This appeal has been decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
On May 10, 2005, plaintiff was in an automobile accident with Oakley, who was driving a van owned by his employer, Port Huron Auto Glass. Plaintiff went to the hospital. He reported soreness throughout his body. Thereafter, he began experiencing pain in his right knee. Plaintiff suffered from hyperextension of the knee, and stated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Auto Club Group Insurance v. BurchellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- McDanield v. HemkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Williams v. MedukasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fisher v. BlankenshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fisher v. BlankenshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fisher v. BlankenshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Helen Faye Lingenfelter v. Farm Bureau General Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019