Legal Opinion

United States v. Various Articles of Obscene Merchandise, Schedule No. 1769

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 25, 1979No. 685, Docket 78-6193PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal by the United States from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Pierre N. Leval, Judge, after a bench trial, finding certain items seized by the United States Customs Service not legally “obscene” and ordering their release to their respective addressees. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

Between September 15 and September 21, 1978, the United States Customs Service seized 132 lots of allegedly obscene…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Time Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1979
  2. People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. United States v. Various Articles of Obscene Merchandise, Schedule No. 2102Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Vernon Beigay, Inc. v. TraxlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API