People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
NEIGHBORS, Justice.
These appeals concern the constitutionality of the Colorado obscenity statutes (the Act), sections 18-7-101 to -105, 8 C.R.S. (1984 Supp.).1 Although each of the three cases arises from a distinct fact pattern and in a different procedural posture, we have elected to consolidate them for one opinion because each appeal involves challenges to the validity of the Act based upon the first amendment to the United States Constitution,2 article II, section 10 of the Colorado Constitution,3 and the due process clauses of each constitution.4 We hold that the word “accredited” used…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited108 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. EarleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Essence, Inc. v. City of Federal HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Bock v. Westminster Mall Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.