Legal Opinion

Beck v. Olin Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1983No. 81-795PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants in a personal injury action. Plaintiff Damon Beck was injured by caustic chemicals while working on the premises of defendant Olin Corporation.

Damon Beck is employed by Corrosion Proof Construction, a division of the Ceilcote Company.1 Ceilcote makes coatings used to line storage tanks, walkways, floors, etc., chiefly for resistance to harsh and corrosive chemicals. At the time of the accident, Beck was a foreman for Corrosion Proof Construction, overseeing the application of Ceilcote liners. On April 16, 1979, Beck was sent to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Crawford Johnson & Co. v. DuffnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Pate v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Gray v. Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Knight v. Burns, Kirkley & Williams Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Breeden v. Hardy Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Armstrong v. Georgia Marble Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Heath v. SIMS BROS. CONST. CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Beverly Kay Johns v. Pettibone Corporation, Frank Van MeterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Mary Katherine Walden, Etc. v. United States Steel Corporation, a Corporation, United States Steel Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API