Legal Opinion

Pate v. United States Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 30, 1981No. 79-509PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal of the trial court's granting of defendant's motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs' evidence. Plaintiffs Clyde Pate and William Carvey sued defendant United States Steel Corporation (USS) for personal injuries sustained while employed as carpenters by J.M. Foster, Inc., (Foster) a builder, on a construction project at the plant of defendant. Their wives filed derivative actions for loss of services. Foster was granted a conditional intervention as a party plaintiff to protect its interest as a workmen's compensation carrier.

Both Pate and Carvey were employed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Solmica of the Gulf Coast, Inc. v. BraggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Gossett v. Twin County Cable TV, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Renfro v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Stovall v. Universal Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Weeks v. Alabama Elec. Co-Op., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API