Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Enventure V
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 14, 1994No. Civ. A. H-93-3125PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court are Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“the FDIC”) motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # 17) and Defendants Enventure V (“Enventure”), Allen B. Daniels (“Daniels”), and Don C. Horton’s (“Horton”) (collectively “defendants”) cross-motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # 19). Having reviewed the motions, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, it is the opinion of the court that the FDIC’s motion should be granted and the defendants’ motion should be denied.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Enventure VCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Ganz v. Lyons Partnership, L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997