Legal Opinion

Kallmeyer v. Garland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 13916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

Plaintiff below, Thomas W. Garland, sued the defendants below, Theodore Kallmeyer and H. A. Davidoff, on open account. The defendants’ answer admitted the account, but alleged they were entitled^ to a certain credit for goods returned to plaintiff, and the cause was tried to a jury and a verdict rendered for plaintiff for the sum claimed. Judgment was entered thereon, and defendants appeal. Defendants did not demur to the evidence or request an instructed verdict, and the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict is not presented to this court on appeal. Muskogee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reed v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Simpson v. MauldinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Ferguson v. Union Nat. Bank of Columbus, OhioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watson v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API