Legal Opinion

Vaccaro v. Favrot

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1929No. 11,608PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoatner, Judge

ad hoc. The plaintiff sues for damages to his automobile resulting from a collision with the defendant’s autotruck. There was judgment below for the plaintiff for $1,588.50, with interest, and the defendant appeals. N

The defendant answered, without exception. At the trial, on the opening of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant objected to *121all evidence on the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action, and at the same time filed a formal exception to the same effect. The objection and exception were overruled by the judge a quo, for the reason, as he stated, that the matters urged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Hackley, Hume & JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Bianchi v. MussachiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Francis v. BarbazonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Kunnes v. KogosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Vila v. WestfeldtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vaccaro v. FavrotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Mershon v. CutrerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Johnson v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. White v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API