Vaccaro v. Favrot
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBoatner, Judge
ad hoc. The plaintiff sues for damages to his automobile resulting from a collision with the defendant’s autotruck. There was judgment below for the plaintiff for $1,588.50, with interest, and the defendant appeals. N
The defendant answered, without exception. At the trial, on the opening of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant objected to *121all evidence on the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action, and at the same time filed a formal exception to the same effect. The objection and exception were overruled by the judge a quo, for the reason, as he stated, that the matters urged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Hackley, Hume & JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Bianchi v. MussachiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Francis v. BarbazonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Kunnes v. KogosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Vila v. WestfeldtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vaccaro v. FavrotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Mershon v. CutrerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Johnson v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- White v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938