Legal Opinion

Lipscomb v. Columbus Municipal Separate School District

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided March 22, 2000No. 1:92CV020-S-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SENTER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff J. Randolph Lipscomb initiated this class action seeking a declaration as to the validity of certain leases of Mississippi sixteenth section land.

In 1816, the United States purchased for $130,000 from the Chickasaw Nation title to land that now comprises parts of northern Alabama and Mississippi. In 1817, following a pattern that had been in place since before the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, see Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 268-69, 106 S.Ct. 2932, 92 L.Ed.2d 209 (1986), Congress authorized the survey and sale of all these lands,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. Columbus Muninicipal Separate School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2003
  2. Clark v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, MSDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2002
  3. Lipscomb v. Columbus Municipal Separate School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2002
  4. Lipscomb v. Columbus Municipal Separate School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API