Lipscomb v. Columbus Municipal Separate School District
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVIDSON, Chief Judge.
Presently before the court is the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on remand. Upon due consideration, the court finds that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part. The motion shall be granted as to the Plaintiffs’ claim that whether the Mayor and City Council for the City of Columbus were the proper lessees of the Columbus sixteenth-section leases cannot affect the validity of those leases. The motion shall also be granted as to the Plaintiffs’ assertion that one of the four…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hill v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Alpha/Omega Insurance Services, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.