McNeel v. Farm Bureau General Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentK. F. Kelly, J.
I respectfully dissent. In my view, plaintiffs’ claim is time-barred under MCL 500.2833(1)(q), and the trial court erred by denying defendant’s motion for summary disposition. Further, the majority’s conclusion that a question of fact exists regarding when the formal denial occurred is erroneous because (1) it fails to apply the plain language of MCL 500.2833(1)(q), (2) it applies the long-discredited judicial tolling doctrine, and (3) it implicitly applies the doctrine of equitable estoppel in the absence of facts supporting its application. I would reverse.
I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.