Legal Opinion
Kantlehner v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 27, 1967No. Civ. A. 65-C-1237PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MISHLER, District Judge.
The third-party defendants move pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order dismissing the third-party complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for such other relief as may be just. Argument on these motions was originally heard on August 10, 1966, at which time none of the parties raised any problem relating to the choice of the governing law. In a memorandum of decision dated September 14, 1966, the court indicated that it was disposed toward granting the motions, but gave all parties an opportunity…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Thomas E. Bowen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Home Insurance Company v. Stuart-McCorkle, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- United States Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- McLean v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.