Legal Opinion
Home Insurance Company v. Stuart-McCorkle, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 8, 1973No. SC 155PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLOODWORTH, Justice.
This is an appeal by the Home Insurance Company (original defendant and third-party plaintiff) from an adverse judgment on its third-party claim against the four appellees (third-party defendants). We affirm, being convinced that the third-party action was barred by the statute of limitations.
The original action was filed by Schloss & Kahn against Home Insurance Company for benefits under an all-risk insurance policy issued to it by Home. The loss claimed was for damages due to ice in the walls and flooring of a large warehouse-size freezer unit used by Schloss & Kahn in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kelly v. ShropshireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, a Corp. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- West Pratt Coal Co. v. DormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Southern Maryland Oil Company v. Texas CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. Virginia B. HaralsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- SYSTEM DYNAMICS INTERN., INC. v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Koch v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.