Legal Opinion
Paske v. County of Dakota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 30, 1984No. CX-84-547PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of respondent Dakota County. Appellants claim they were county employees and are entitled to severance benefits. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
Appellants are stenographers who served as court reporters for judges of the Dakota County Court. On April 10, 1980, the First Judicial District adopted a court unification plan under which all judges in the district have authority and jurisdiction to hear all matters. Dakota County is in the First Judicial District. Pursuant to a resolution of the First Judicial District Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Wangen v. City of FountainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Voight v. Counties of Big StoneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Paske v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986