Legal Opinion
ROLAX Et Al. v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO. Et Al.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1951No. 6167_1PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Chief Judge.
These are cross appeals in a suit instituted in the court below by Negro locomotive firemen employed by the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company against that company and the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen. The purpose of the suit was to have the court declare void the agreement of February 18, 1941, which was condemned by this court in Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Tunstall, 4 Cir., 163 F.2d 289, 291, to enjoin the defendants from (carrying out the terms of that agreement in violation of the seniority rights of plain- l tiffs and to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Rosa M. Figueroa De Arroyo v. Sindicato De Trabajadores Packinghouse, Afl-Cio, and Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.