Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Robertson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Bullock Probate Court. Heard before Hon. S. T. Frazer. The credit of $2,890 was properly given tlie administrator.' — Code, 1886, § 2664; Schouler on Executors & Adm’rs, §§ 315, 317, 320; 70 Ala. 575; 66 Ala. 35.
1Opinion of the CourtSomekvtlle, J.
The motion is made to dismiss the present appeal on the ground that the settlement of the in*490solvent estate of Johns by the Probate Court, which took place on January 14th, 1888, was partial ancl not final in its character. While the sefllement is partial, and has in view only a partial distribution of the funds of the estate among creditors, the decree or order of distribution is nevertheless, in our opinion, final within the meaning of the statute relating to appeals from courts of probate in this State. An appeal lies to the Supreme Court “from any final decree of the court of probate, or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Savage v. BenhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- Harrison's Adm'r v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
- Thompson v. HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- State v. GrammWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
- Rome & Decatur Railroad v. SibertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Booth v. Dexter Steam Fire Engine Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Turley v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.