Legal Opinion
Faitz v. Ruegg
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1981No. Civ. 45631PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
This is an appeal 1 from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining without leave to amend on grounds of res judicata, the demurrer of Carol Ruegg to the divorced father’s (Henry J. Faitz) instant complaint seeking damages for medical expenses incurred on behalf of his minor daughter, who was thrown from a horse owned and maintained by defendant.
The pertinent facts are not in dispute. As revealed by the record before us and the prior unpublished opinion of this court (Div. One), No. 40475, filed July 25, 1977, of which we have taken judicial notice (as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Heaton v. Marin County Employees Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Shriver v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- In Re Marriage of MuldrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bell v. HummelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Waranch v. Gulf Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- White v. Moreno Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Lopez v. KingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Cortez v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.