Legal Opinion
Cortez v. County of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 6, 1983No. CV 82-5502 CHHPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on December 13, 1982 for hearing on defendants’ motions to dismiss the Complaint for failure to join an indispensable party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19, and to strike portions of the Complaint. After considering the points and authorities submitted by the parties, and the arguments of *428counsel, it is ORDERED that both motions are denied.
1. Motion to Dismiss For Failure to Join an Indispensable Party
Plaintiffs Jose and Josefina Cortez are citizens of Mexico. Their son, Adrian, was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Bardomiano Aguilar & Rosa Aguilar, Etc. v. Los Angeles County, L.A. county/u.s.c. Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- General Motors Corp. v. Ignacio Lopez De ArriortuaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Glover v. NarickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.