Reich & Binstock, LLP v. Scates
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARON McCALLY, Justice.
In this appeal from a bench trial, a law firm seeks to set aside the trial court’s determination that its payment arrangement with an expert violates the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. The law firm further asks that we reverse the trial court’s grant of equitable relief to the expert based on a theory of quantum meruit. We affirm.
Background
Appellee Robert Scates worked as a consulting and occasionally testifying expert for appellant Reich & Binstock, LLP (R & B), a Houston law firm, for numerous years. Scates had other clients, but he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Lubbock County v. Trammel's Bail BondsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Willis v. DonnellyTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Willis v. Donnelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Dardas v. Fleming, Hovenkamp & Grayson, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Guggenheim Corporate Funding, LLC, Orpheus Holdings LLC, Stellar Funding Ltd., and Orpheus Funding LLC v. Valerus Compression Services, L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- In Re Marisol Garza v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026
- In Re Sonia Trevino v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2024
- Jerica Ticer v. Theodore B. Shybut MD and Mark Adickes, MD, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
- Lundstrom, Jr. v. Homolka, P.A.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.