Legal Opinion

Willis v. Donnelly

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2006No. 04-0409PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett

This dispute centers on whether shareholders in closely held corporations can be held hable to an individual who agreed to a contractual business arrangement with the corporations. We agree with Petitioners Michael and Francie Willis (the Willises) that they cannot be held hable to Respondent Dan Donnelly under breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty theories. We address other issues as well.

I. Background

A. Factual Background

Michael Willis (Willis) is a successful Houston entrepreneur. In the late 1980s, he became intrigued with the idea of opening a high-end spa, where customers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lee C. Ritchie v. Ann Caldwell Rupe, as Trustee for the Dallas Gordon Rupe, III 1995 Family TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Frank Boggio v. USAA Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Lundy v. Masson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. Walker v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API