Legal Opinion
Dardas v. Fleming, Hovenkamp & Grayson, P.C.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided April 27, 2006No. 14-03-00538-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION ON REHEARING
KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.
We overrule “Appellees’ Further Motion for Rehearing.” We withdraw the opinion issued in this case on August 18, 2005, and we issue the following majority opinion on rehearing.
This appeal arises out of a dispute between two groups of attorneys as to entitlement to attorney’s fees in class-action litigation. Appellants/plaintiffs Thomas A. Dardas, individually and d/b/a Dardas & Associates and Bill Ogletree, P.C. a/k/a Ogletree Law Firm appeal the trial court’s summary judgment dismissing their claims against appellees/defendants…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Seureau v. ExxonMobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Garcia v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
- Franks v. Roades, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Cruse v. O'QUINN, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Paull & Partners Investments, LLC v. John B .Berry, Patricia P. Berry, and Exbury Investments, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.