Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Cawthorne

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1975No. Civ. 45169PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

This appeal involves the narrow issue of the distribution of the proceeds of a life insurance policy purchased with community funds where one spouse has killed the other in circumstances rendering-the slayer guilty of voluntary manslaughter. We conclude that the named beneficiaiy of the policy is not entitled to be paid the slayer’s community interest in it. The slayer, having defaulted in the action at bench but her daughter and heir-at-law having appeared, the daughter is entitled to one-half of the proceeds of the insurance and the named beneficiaiy to the other one-half.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beck v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Tyre v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Johansen v. PeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Manufacturers Life Ins. Co. v. MooreDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  5. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. HarrisonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Su-Chang Haung Tang, and v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, Jaw-Mann Jong, Also Known as Chung Hao-Man and Chung Chao-Man, Cross-Complainant and v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Cross-DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Mendez-Bellido v. BD. OF TR. OF DIV. 1181, ATUDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  3. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. PrimofioreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. State Farm Life Insurance v. PearceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API