Legal Opinion

Nowak v. Pennsylvania Professional Soccer, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-4165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

KEARNEY, District Judge.

Parties agreeing to arbitrate their employment disputes must understand a federal court reviewing the selected arbitrator’s decision gives extreme deference to the arbitrator’s findings. If unhappy with the arbitrator’s decision and seeking a court to vacate the decision, a party should know federal courts do not second guess but instead presume the reasoned award is enforceable. We only review these issues when the arbitration winner moves to confirm or a disappointed party moves to vacate, the arbitration award. When, as presented here, a disappointed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jeffrey I Golden v. O'Melveny & Myers, LLPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  2. Nemo Digital Holdings Corp. v. XYZ Financial Markets LLC et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  3. TONNELLE NORTH BERGEN, LLC v. SB-PB VICTORY, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API