Nowak v. Pennsylvania Professional Soccer, LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEARNEY, District Judge.
Parties agreeing to arbitrate their employment disputes must understand a federal court reviewing the selected arbitrator’s decision gives extreme deference to the arbitrator’s findings. If unhappy with the arbitrator’s decision and seeking a court to vacate the decision, a party should know federal courts do not second guess but instead presume the reasoned award is enforceable. We only review these issues when the arbitration winner moves to confirm or a disappointed party moves to vacate, the arbitration award. When, as presented here, a disappointed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jeffrey I Golden v. O'Melveny & Myers, LLPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Nemo Digital Holdings Corp. v. XYZ Financial Markets LLC et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- TONNELLE NORTH BERGEN, LLC v. SB-PB VICTORY, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023